Posted on by 1000filmsblog

#382 Last Summer

Watched: August 9 2026

Director: Frank Perry

Starring: Barbara Hershey, Catherine Burns, Richard Thomas, Bruce Davison

Year: 1969

Runtime: 1h 35min

We continue our streak of feelbad movies with this horrible gem from Frank Perry. Teenagers Sandy (Hershey), Dan (Davison) and Peter (Thomas) meet on Fire Island one summer and bond over a dying seagull. After some improvised veterinary (ornithological?) surgery, Peter becomes Sandy’s new hero and the three of them become inseperable for the season. Both boys are smitten with the fairly uninhibited Sandy, and as they nurse the seagull back to health, get up to drunken shenanigans and laugh together about sexual assault (WTF Sandy’s stepdad???), they develop an unhealthy us-against-the-world mentality.

Fortunately, nothing has ever gone wrong when you mix horned up teenagers, drugs and alcohol, and no adult supervision with summer, sun and rivalry.

Sandy keeps the gull as a pet, but when it does what wild animals do and bites her, she takes it into the woods and brutally murders it. This is what we in the business refers to as “Chekov’s Seagull™” (ok, so it’s not really that, just your run-of-the-mill foreshadowing, but the phrase is just too good to pass up).

“Hot girls keep literary devices as pets”

The trio gradually start hanging out with Rhoda (Burns) who, despite seeming younger, or at least less worldly than them, is not initially intimidated by Sandy and her two minions. They follow the mean girl playbook of adopting her and including her just enough for her to crave their approval, but not enough to actually become part of the crew. More of a pet, really… The only exception is Peter, who seems to genuine like the new girl, at least most of the time.

When he isn’t busy liking Sandy and Dan’s approval more, that is.

We went into this blind, and were intrigued from the start. There are a lot of WTF-moments, such as the normalization of sexually assaulting young girls (both girls have stories about their parents’ friends that are NOT ok). Also, the three guys chasing after them after they’ve been to the cinema (to watch Bergman, it seems – our old dog would have loved it!) – they really decided to go after a girl flanked by two men in order to rape and/or rob her? Seems a bit much, even for rapists. Then there’s Sandy’s psychopathic tendencies and the seagull…

“I may or may not be sleeping with your mother, little girl, but that doesn’t mean a guy can’t shoot his shot?”

Last Summer is a very tense movie and it made us extremely worried, stressed and scared. Rhoda (and Catherine Burns!) was amazing though – despite her insecurities she was the only one who would stand up to Sandy and even in the end, she challenged her “superiority.” Sandy and Dan were just bullies, but we ended up hating Peter the most. He followed along with everything the other two decided to do but then felt really bad afterwards, ok? Like, he’s actually a really nice guy, you see. He didn’t really mean the things he did, he swears. In fact, he didn’t even reeeeally do any of it, he just sort of… participated. But not actively. So you can’t exactly blame him, all right? The other two initiated everything, so they’re the bad guys, really. Honestly, he’s a victim too! Really!

“Besides, if (other) people don’t want to be victims, they should stop putting themselves in vulnerable positions. Such as hanging out with their friends. Or trying to find love through dating ads.”

What we learned: If you keep doing horrible things but then feel bad about them afterwards, it actually changes nothing. You are the literal worst.

MVP: Rhoda. And #Chekovsseagull.

Next time: Midnight Cowboy (1969)

Posted on by 1000filmsblog

#372 The Swimmer

Watched: November 4 2025

Director: Frank Perry, Sydney Pollack

Starring: Burt Lancaster, Janet Landgard, Janice Rule, Marge Champion, Joan Rivers, Nancy Cushman, House Jameson, Tony Bickley

Year: 1968

Runtime: 1h 35min

Welcome to the surreal world of The Swimmer. You’re in for quite a ride… Ned Merrill (Lancaster) is running around in his bathing suit in a gorgeous woodland, as people do. He drops by some old friends’ backyard and goes for a swim in their pool. The friends are hungover from the night before, and have not seen Ned for aaaaages. But they love him, and he’s such a great guy. While reminiscing with them, Ned has the brilliant idea to swim all the way home, by way of his neighbours’ pools which form a “river” the entire way. Off he goes!

But not without a drink in his hand. He’s not an animal.

As he makes his wet way towards his house he meets several old friends and acquaintances, but the vibe changes discernibly as he gets closer and closer to home. In the beginning, all the people he meets are old friends who clearly see him as a good guy, although they all get a bit weird whenever his wife or daughters are brought up. But as he gets closer to home, the people he encounters are increasingly hostile and keep hinting more and more to something that clearly has gone wrong in Ned’s life. Our “hero” also goes super sleazy with Julie (Landgard), a young girl who used to babysit for his kids. Things get gradually darker and weirder until he finally reaches “home.”

It starts off so innocently. Even bringing along his very young former babysitter seems wholesome at first. Until it’s not…

We had no idea what we were getting ourselves into, but we were hooked from the start. We loved how our view of Ned changed throughout the movie – from seeming to be a nice enough man (and just a little bit inappropriate with all the women he knew) in the beginning, to a creepy, cheating, horrible narcissist at the end.

This scene with his former mistress is the best depiction we’ve seen of a man completely unravelling when he finds out a woman has faked her orgasms. Actual quote: “You loved it. You loved it. We both loved it. YOU LOVED IT!” And she’s just there like “Sure, Jan.”

The Swimmer kept us questioning throughout, and we came up with about 271 theories on what was actually going on. What happened to his daughters? His wife? Is this a sort of “life flashing before his eyes” scenario? Are we in purgatory? Is he senile? Is this a portrayal of his gradual corruption and entitlement throughout his life told through a swimming pool voyage? ‘Twas a mystery wrapped in an enigma. In the end, things start coming together and some questions are answered, but we’re still not 100% sure what exactly we just watched. That being said, we loved it (actually loved it. It wasn’t just a man telling us we did).

Another bit of unravelling: at the first pools people find him quirky and charming for going around in his swim trunks at a clothed event. As he progresses, not so much…

Among our favourite things were the ’60s parties he kept crashing (such a vibe!), the Hallorans, the way we liked Ned less and less as we went along, his increasingly fragile ego and psyche, and the many mysteries hidden in the plot. Also, the beautiful scenery added to the film’s dreamlike quality which, granted, gradually descended into a nightmare. Watch it!

Preferably through a closed, rusted fence with an anguished look on your face as you gradually realise the reality of your existence and slowly descend into madness and despair. It’s what we did.

What we learned: Dude! No means NO!!!

MVP: The pools. Or, possibly, the narrative technique. Or Ned’s fragile male ego.

Next time: The Thomas Crown Affair (1968)